Poker and business ask for the same three things: the right traits, the right conditions and the right setting. Research has measured some of them well and others hardly at all. Here is what it takes, what happens when one piece is missing, and when to step back, wait or keep going. I am writing it having just put my own competitive poker on hold.

The traits that matter, and the ones that are overrated

Founders have been studied for decades and poker players more recently. Across dozens of studies, traits that fit the actual work of running a business correlate about .25 with success, while general traits that do not fit the work show almost no link.¹ That is a real effect and a modest one, so traits raise the odds without deciding the result. Six of them have evidence behind them.

Courage is not a taste for risk

Two traits feel like success traits and are not. People who invested in the stock market were 50% more likely to start a business, and their businesses had about 25% lower sales.¹⁰ Founders who were more optimistic grew their businesses more slowly.¹¹

Courage is something else: making the right move while you are afraid of it. Poker coaches describe its absence as fear, avoiding the correct play because it carries variance, and they describe desperation tilt as forcing action to win back what you lost.¹² Fear skips risks worth taking. Desperation takes risks that are not.

The conditions: a thin edge that needs time

Skill in tournament poker is real, and it is thin. Two economists flagged 720 players as skilled before the 2010 World Series of Poker, then followed all 57 events and 32,496 players.¹³

2010 World Series of Poker, 57 events, 32,496 players¹⁴

A clear edge beats a random opponent only a little more than half the time, and about 9 in 10 entrants win nothing in a typical event.¹⁴ Business has the same shape: almost three in four founders of venture-backed companies received nothing when the company was sold or closed.¹⁵

So how long until results show who is good? In a simple model of a 100-player tournament, made for this article, a player who gets back 19% more than she pays in needs about 1,450 tournaments before the results confirm the edge with 95% confidence.

Two things follow. First, judge decisions, not results: experienced players make more mathematically sound decisions and dwell less on what went wrong.¹⁶ Second, the real condition for success is staying in long enough for the edge to show. In poker, bankroll guides say that means a bankroll kept apart from rent, food and bills, with about 100 buy-ins as the usual minimum for tournaments.¹⁷¹⁸ In business, it means an income while you test. People who started a business while still employed, then went full time, were much more likely to survive than people who quit their job to start,¹⁹ and when France let jobless people keep their benefits while starting a business, more firms opened, and they grew and survived as well as the rest.²⁰ Expert founders also decide in advance how much they can afford to lose, and commit only that.²¹

The setting: sleep matters more than willpower

When a condition is missing: what money pressure does

Money is the condition people blame most often. In 2013 a well-known study reported that thinking about a big bill lowered poorer people's scores on thinking tests, and the press release compared the drop to losing 13 IQ points.²⁶ The headline did not survive larger tests.

What does hold up is risk. Two studies of experienced online players point the same way: after a big loss, or when behind in a session, they took more risk.²⁹³⁰ When behind, they also kept playing, and when ahead, they eased off.²⁹ In the lab, people switch from careful to risky when the safe option cannot cover what they need.³¹ If you sit down needing to win a certain amount this month, expect a pull toward big-risk lines that could close the gap.

Stress works in both directions. A short burst of stress nudges people toward riskier choices, most of all where the risk is the worse bet.³² A week of raised stress hormone made people more careful instead.³³ Nobody has tested it in poker, but this suggests weeks of money worry could make you tight and passive in some spots and reckless in others: the fear and the desperation tilt described above. A big pot pulls the other way, and I wrote about what a win does to your next decisions in how to make success in poker last.

When to step back, wait or keep going

These rules combine findings from separate fields. Nobody has tested them as a set, and the numbers in them are yours to choose.

1. Step back when staying costs what you are playing for.

   Name what the game is for: income, freedom, growth, the people around it. In a study of small-business owners, whether they kept going depended on their own threshold, set by what else they could do and what the work gave them beyond money.³⁴ If staying in costs the things you are playing for, stepping back is the decision that serves them.

2. Protect the runway before you stop.

   Keep living money apart from playing money, and when the bankroll falls below the floor you set, play smaller first. In a business, keep an income while you test.

3. Never move up to close a gap.

   When a sentence like "I have to win this much this month" shows up, that is the pull to get even. It is a signal to play smaller, not to chase.

4. Skip the session when your state says so.

   Short sleep, a late finish the night before, anger, a few drinks. Set the line before the series, while you are calm.

5. Wait only for something with a date.

   A payment that will land, a result you will know, a number of tournaments you will reach. Write down what each outcome means. If nothing will change by waiting, act at a smaller size instead.

6. Write your exits in advance, and give them to someone.

   "If by [date] [this] has not happened, I will [move down / pause / stop]." Annie Duke calls these kill criteria.³⁵ When people stuck on a big decision let a coin flip decide, those the coin told to make the change were happier two and six months later.³⁶

7. Keep going when the process is sound, and persist on the process, not the ego.

   People stay too long when their ego is on the line or they have already put in a lot of time. Picturing the regret, and seeing what else the time and money could do, makes them stop sooner.³⁷ If your state checks pass and your hand review shows good decisions, treat the losses as variance, and do not stop because of them. If tilt is mild and the limits you set for the session still hold, you can stay and use your routine: one mental-game coach argues that quitting early to avoid tilt can itself be a sign of tilt.³⁸

A two-week test: is money hurting your poker?

You cannot answer this from results. You can answer it from your own hands, in a few weeks.

This test follows from the research above. It has not been tested as a method itself.

Where the app and the coaching fit

Identity-First Poker Coach is the app I built for live players. You log a hand in a few taps between hands, and after a few sessions Insights shows what repeats. Alerts are reminders you set before the session, while you are calm, for moments like a big loss or a short stack.

General information about decisions and research, not financial or investment advice. Poker is for players 18 and over. If you play with money you need for living, or find it hard to stop, read about responsible play.

Sources

1. Rauch, Andreas, and Michael Frese. "Let's Put the Person Back into Entrepreneurship Research: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship between Business Owners' Personality Traits, Business Creation, and Success." European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 16, no. 4 (2007): 353-385. doi.org
2. Zhao, Hao, and Scott E. Seibert. "The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review." Journal of Applied Psychology 91, no. 2 (2006): 259-271. doi.org
3. Gollwitzer, Peter M., and Paschal Sheeran. "Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Effects and Processes." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2006): 69-119. doi.org
4. Crede, Marcus, Michael C. Tynan, and Peter D. Harms. "Much Ado about Grit: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of the Grit Literature." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113, no. 3 (2017): 492-511. doi.org
5. Mueller, Brandon A., Marcus T. Wolfe, and Imran Syed. "Passion and Grit: An Exploration of the Pathways Leading to Venture Success." Journal of Business Venturing 32, no. 3 (2017): 260-279. doi.org
6. Zhao, Hao, Scott E. Seibert, and G. T. Lumpkin. "The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review." Journal of Management 36, no. 2 (2010): 381-404. doi.org
7. Camuffo, Arnaldo, Alessandro Cordova, Alfonso Gambardella, and Chiara Spina. "A Scientific Approach to Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial." Management Science 66, no. 2 (2020): 564-586. doi.org
8. Laakasuo, Michael, Jussi Palomaki, and Mikko Salmela. "Experienced Poker Players Are Emotionally Stable." Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17, no. 10 (2014): 668-671. doi.org
9. Palomaki, Jussi, Michael Laakasuo, and Mikko Salmela. "Losing More by Losing It: Poker Experience, Sensitivity to Losses and Tilting Severity." Journal of Gambling Studies 30, no. 1 (2014): 187-200. doi.org
10. Hvide, Hans K., and Georgios A. Panos. "Risk Tolerance and Entrepreneurship." Journal of Financial Economics 111, no. 1 (2014): 200-223. econpapers.repec.org
11. Hmieleski, Keith M., and Robert A. Baron. "Entrepreneurs' Optimism and New Venture Performance: A Social Cognitive Perspective." Academy of Management Journal 52, no. 3 (2009): 473-488. doi.org
12. Tendler, Jared, and Barry Carter. The Mental Game of Poker. 2011. Book excerpts published by The Hendon Mob on desperation tilt and on fear (second link). thehendonmob.com thehendonmob.com
13. Levitt, Steven D., and Thomas J. Miles. "The Role of Skill Versus Luck in Poker: Evidence From the World Series of Poker." Journal of Sports Economics 15, no. 1 (2014): 31-44. doi.org
14. Levitt, Steven D., and Thomas J. Miles. "The Role of Skill Versus Luck in Poker: Evidence from the World Series of Poker." NBER Working Paper 17023 (2011). www.nber.org
15. Hall, Robert E., and Susan E. Woodward. "The Burden of the Nondiversifiable Risk of Entrepreneurship." American Economic Review 100, no. 3 (2010): 1163-1194. econpapers.repec.org
16. Palomaki, Jussi, Michael Laakasuo, and Mikko Salmela. "'Don't Worry, It's Just Poker!' Experience, Self-Rumination and Self-Reflection as Determinants of Decision-Making in On-Line Poker." Journal of Gambling Studies 29, no. 3 (2013): 491-505. doi.org
17. PokerNews Staff. "10 MTT Tips: Bankroll Management." PokerNews, 2016. Practitioner guidance. www.pokernews.com
18. Pokerfuse. "Poker Bankroll Management." Pokerfuse, 2026. Practitioner guidance. pokerfuse.com
19. Raffiee, Joseph, and Jie Feng. "Should I Quit My Day Job? A Hybrid Path to Entrepreneurship." Academy of Management Journal 57, no. 4 (2014): 936-963. doi.org
20. Hombert, Johan, Antoinette Schoar, David Sraer, and David Thesmar. "Can Unemployment Insurance Spur Entrepreneurial Activity? Evidence from France." Journal of Finance 75, no. 3 (2020): 1247-1285. econpapers.repec.org
21. Dew, Nicholas, Stuart Read, Saras D. Sarasvathy, and Robert Wiltbank. "Effectual versus Predictive Logics in Entrepreneurial Decision-Making: Differences between Experts and Novices." Journal of Business Venturing 24, no. 4 (2009): 287-309. econpapers.repec.org
22. Hamel, Alexandre, Celyne Bastien, Christian Jacques, Axelle Moreau, and Isabelle Giroux. "Sleep or Play Online Poker? Gambling Behaviors and Tilt Symptoms While Sleep Deprived." Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 (2021): 600092. doi.org
23. Williamson, A. M., and Anne-Marie Feyer. "Moderate Sleep Deprivation Produces Impairments in Cognitive and Motor Performance Equivalent to Legally Prescribed Levels of Alcohol Intoxication." Occupational and Environmental Medicine 57, no. 10 (2000): 649-655. doi.org
24. Horn, Tori L., James P. Whelan, and Gregory T. Weil. "Does Acute Alcohol Consumption Increase Risk-Taking While Gambling? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Addiction 117, no. 11 (2022): 2780-2790. doi.org
25. Hagger, Martin S., et al. "A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect." Perspectives on Psychological Science 11, no. 4 (2016): 546-573. doi.org
26. Mani, Anandi, Sendhil Mullainathan, Eldar Shafir, and Jiaying Zhao. "Poverty Impedes Cognitive Function." Science 341, no. 6149 (2013): 976-980. The 13 IQ points comparison is from the university press release (ScienceDaily, 2013). doi.org
27. Carvalho, Leandro S., Stephan Meier, and Stephanie W. Wang. "Poverty and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from Changes in Financial Resources at Payday." American Economic Review 106, no. 2 (2016): 260-284. doi.org
28. Szecsi, Peter, Pal Kolumban, Aikaterini Taka, and Barnabas Szaszi. "The Impact of Financial Resources on Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Collabra: Psychology 11, no. 1 (2025). doi.org
29. Eil, David, and Jaimie W. Lien. "Staying Ahead and Getting Even: Risk Attitudes of Experienced Poker Players." Games and Economic Behavior 87 (2014): 50-69. doi.org
30. Smith, Gary, Michael Levere, and Robert Kurtzman. "Poker Player Behavior After Big Wins and Big Losses." Management Science 55, no. 9 (2009): 1547-1555. doi.org
31. Mishra, Sandeep, and Martin L. Lalumiere. "You Can't Always Get What You Want: The Motivational Effect of Need on Risk-Sensitive Decision-Making." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 46, no. 4 (2010): 605-611. doi.org
32. Starcke, Katrin, and Matthias Brand. "Effects of Stress on Decisions Under Uncertainty: A Meta-Analysis." Psychological Bulletin 142, no. 9 (2016): 909-933. doi.org
33. Kandasamy, Narayanan, Ben Hardy, Lionel Page, Markus Schaffner, Johann Graggaber, Andrew S. Powlson, Paul C. Fletcher, Mark Gurnell, and John Coates. "Cortisol Shifts Financial Risk Preferences." PNAS 111, no. 9 (2014): 3608-3613. doi.org
34. Gimeno, Javier, Timothy B. Folta, Arnold C. Cooper, and Carolyn Y. Woo. "Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms." Administrative Science Quarterly 42, no. 4 (1997): 750-783. doi.org
35. Duke, Annie. "Author Talks: What Poker Pro Annie Duke Can Teach You About Quitting on Time." McKinsey Author Talks, 4 November 2022. Interview on her book Quit (2022). Practitioner guidance. karriere.mckinsey.de
36. Levitt, Steven D. "Heads or Tails: The Impact of a Coin Toss on Major Life Decisions and Subsequent Happiness." Review of Economic Studies 88, no. 1 (2021): 378-405. NBER Working Paper 22487. www.nber.org
37. Sleesman, Dustin J., Donald E. Conlon, Gerry McNamara, and Jonathan E. Miles. "Cleaning Up the Big Muddy: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Determinants of Escalation of Commitment." Academy of Management Journal 55, no. 3 (2012): 541-562. doi.org
38. Carter, Barry. "How to Know When to Quit a Losing Poker Session." PokerStrategy, updated 2026. Practitioner guidance. www.pokerstrategy.com